The original author of this compendium, Dr. Ashok Kundapur, invites you to add to this page by clicking edit (above), or to leave comments or questions by clicking discussion and then edit. You can leave a message for Ashok directly on his talk page.
|Previous: Cylindro-parabolic cookers|
|Next: Concentrators from above|
Plane mirrors were also in vogue in solar cooking but it was Adams who, in 1870, built a cooker at Bombay using plane mirrors (Bowman, Blatt 1978). He was able to cook food for several soldiers. The cooker consisted of sixteen flat mirrors strips arranged to form a cone around a flat black surface meant for the cooking vessel. Further, it was covered with a glass dome with a wooden handle. Such a design was available till recently in the market. The cooker very similar to this, called ‘Solar chef’ was marketed by Sedona Solar Shop, (PO 3072, West Sedona, Arizona 86340, USA.) Professor Bowman found the performance of the cooker satisfactory. He suggested some improvements like fixing the mirror assembly on to a stand such that it could be oriented to the sun, increasing the number and size of the assembly as well as the central dome to accommodate bigger cooking vessels. Insulating the flat plate at the bottom was also suggested. This variation gave good results. Farber (1975) describes a similar design where the mirror cone is comparatively larger .The Chinese designers (Fang, Susan 1979) have another interesting variation. Here, the 15-20 cm wide and 25-30 cm flat long mirror strips were arranged in a row of 14-16 pieces. Two such rows of mirrors were hinged at the center. These mirrors focused the rays on to a cooking pan held on top of the grill projecting from the center of the hinged panels. There must have been some mechanism to tilt the mirrors, but the details were not available.
Bowman created a new design called FIT design which was an offshoot of his studies on cookers especially Compound Parabolic type of cooker. He felt that flat-mirror assemblies were the best for villagers. The cooker consisted of a solid frame to hold an insulated box with a door to house the cooking vessels. The box did not have insulation at the bottom but a sheet of weld – mesh. Light was focused by 15 strips of mirrors held in a row at the base of this stand. Provision was made to tilt the mirrors to aid in focus and this was affected with one single lever, and the frame could also be rotated to face the sun.
For domestic use Bowman suggests a mirror assembly of about 19 mirrors with a length of 120 cm held at an angle of 100 to the horizontal (Bowman, Blatt 1978). FIT Concept 3 had a mirror assembly of 3 m and it could melt even lead (MP 327.50 C). The FIT concepts described were excellent performers and with some more adaptations like folding the reflector for easier transportation and storing, mounting the entire assembly on bigger wheels for easy mobility, and orientation would have made these cookers very popular. Interestingly, such a cooker was fabricated here at the Manipal Institute of Technology (MIT), Manipal, under a student project, but the cooker did not perform well. The Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), New Delhi, suggests the use of such a row of mirrors to be kept outside the house and to concentrate the rays on to the vessel kept inside the house. Concept III proposed here by the author envisages the use of two rows of mirrors as in the Chinese design and the entire assembly kept at the window. However, depending on the location and orientation of the house, it may be essential to shift the cooker from one window to another, in which case the design has to incorporate features which would enable easy mobility.
Concept IV proposed in this review is a variation of Bowman’s design. In this variation, the use of a larger window covered with glass is suggested at the base of the insulated cooking box such that a larger reflector array could be incorporated without increasing the height of the stand, but if a 3 or 4 m long array is to be incorporated for faster cooking then the height of the stand has to be increase. In such a case, three or four steps may be added to the stand for easy access to the cooking vessels inside the insulated box.
Professor Bernard's 'NELPA' cooker appears to be slight variation from Professor Bowmans design, but evidently an independent design of this type.
The photo presented below was sent by Professor Bernard, note that the cooker has provision for two pots. (This reviewer has added a couple sketches so as to enable the reader to build a Nelpa. He thanks Editions-Jouvence.fr, publishers from France for permission to use these drawings.
Professor Bernard's 'NELPA' cooker, though author finds the design very close to that of Professor Bowman's FIT design presented above he feel 'NELPA' has been designed independently. For some reason Professor Bowman's designs had not become popular.'NELPA' when folded forms a neat little 'packet'.
Any person who visits this review site would feel that it will not be possible to evolve a new design, but new design keep on appearing and two such useful designs, and very promising one at that, are by Xavier Devos and Atouts Soleil of France another design by Alexander of Germany.
Xavior Devos and Atouts Soleil of France (email@example.com) present a new variation of Bowman's variation. It could be regarded as improvement over Roger Bernard's NELPA. Variation is in the form of a larger concentrator below the table. The two photos furnish the design details and effectiveness of the setup. They have detailed the design in pdf format. (http://www.solarcooking.org/Devos-cooker-description.pdf)
Alexander Safronov of Germany has proposed a very innovative design called as Romaschka Cooker. The cooking vessel is incorporated in the table. A Flat reflector of about one meter long reflects the sun light into the cooker box. Two additional strips of reflectors augment sun light. The setup appears to be quite effective as the designer has been able to grill meat.(http://www.solarcooking.org/Romaschka.htm)
Professor Ajay Chandak, working at Dhule, is a versatile inventor. Independent inventors and workers have problem or are not so keen writhing a technical paper, and naturally they remain unknown for a long time. It is with this wish to list all such workers this review has been evolved. This review enables an inventor to add his work directly to this site.
If an agency decides to sponsor this work, the reviewer wishes to test each and every such solar cooker especially designed by ‘non technical’ workers, and maintain a detailed database along with this site.
Professor Ajay is the founder president of an NGO at Dhule. The organization is called as PRINCE (Promoters and Researchers In Non Conventional Energy, http://www.princeindia.org) I Author strongly urge the reader to visit to this excellent site.
Professor Ajay has developed Hybrid Solar Cooker, which reviewer has classified as an independent Design under new category of mixed types. It is similar to Professor Bowman’s FIT Design, but different and one step ahead it, or for that matter Professor Bernard’s Nelpa. Ajay writes that the performance is as good as or even better than that of Parabolic cooker. The temperature developed was so high that they had problem with the Glazing used at the bottom of the box. Further technical details are awaited.
There could be slight confusion as to the classification. Because in the Box cooker section Deve's Inverted Cooker has been described. Ajay's cooker has been developed after this inverted cooker concept. The design is included here because it uses multiple plane mirror reflectors.
|Previous: Cylindro-parabolic cookers|
|Next: Concentrators from above|